John Deere 4044R vs Bobcat CT5545 Compact Tractor
Compare the John Deere 4044R and Bobcat CT5545 compact tractors to determine which model offers superior performance, features, and value. This side-by-side comparison highlights engine power, lift capacity, and standard equipment to help you choose the best compact tractor for your property or small farm.
The John Deere 4044R is a 43.1-hp compact utility tractor designed for property owners and small-scale agricultural tasks. It features a hydrostatic transmission, 4WD, and a lift capacity of 2,500 lbs at 24 inches behind the link arms. The Bobcat CT5545 offers 45 hp, a 3-range hydrostatic transmission, and a higher lift capacity of 3,177 lbs at the same point. Both tractors cater to users seeking reliability and versatility in a compact package.
John Deere 4044R Pros:
Reliable Yanmar diesel engine with 43.1 hp
eHydroâ„¢ transmission for easy operation
Compact size ideal for maneuvering in tight spaces
Strong brand reputation and extensive dealer network
John Deere 4044R Cons:
Lower lift capacity compared to Bobcat CT5545
Fewer standard comfort features; many require upgrades
Limited hydraulic flow may restrict attachment versatility
Higher base price than some competitors
Bobcat CT5545 Pros:
Higher lift capacity of 3,177 lbs at 24 inches behind lift point
3-range hydrostatic transmission with electronic control
More standard features, including mid-PTO and ergonomic controls
Competitive pricing with strong value proposition
Bobcat CT5545 Cons:
Slightly larger footprint than 4044R
Smaller dealer network compared to John Deere
Fewer optional upgrades available
Cab models may have limited availability in some regions
Bobcat vs. John Deere 4044R:
While the John Deere 4044R offers a slightly lower horsepower and a well-established dealer network, the Bobcat CT5545 provides a higher lift capacity and more standard features at a competitive price. For operators seeking greater value and versatility without compromising performance, the Bobcat CT5545 stands out as a compelling choice.