CAT 903 vs Bobcat L65 Compact Wheel Loaders
Compare the CAT 903 and Bobcat L65 compact wheel loaders to determine which model offers superior performance, features, and value. This side-by-side comparison highlights engine power, operating weight, and bucket capacity to help you choose the best compact wheel loader for your property or small construction projects.
The CAT 903 is a compact wheel loader powered by a 48-hp diesel engine. It offers an operating weight of 9,200 lbs and bucket capacities ranging from 0.8 to 1.3 cubic yards. The machine features a compact design, allowing it to work efficiently in confined spaces.
The Bobcat L65 is a compact wheel loader equipped with a 55-hp diesel engine. It has an operating weight of 9,944 lbs and bucket capacities ranging from 0.86 to 1.3 cubic yards. The L65’s design enables it to operate effectively in tight areas while providing enhanced stability.
CAT 903 Pros:
Compact design for efficient operation in confined spaces
Lower operating weight enhances maneuverability
Fuel-efficient diesel engine
Advanced hydraulic system for improved performance
CAT 903 Cons:
Lower engine horsepower compared to Bobcat L65
Smaller bucket capacity may limit material handling efficiency
Limited operator comfort features
Basic cab features
Bobcat L65 Pros:
Higher engine horsepower (55 hp) for improved performance
Greater operating weight enhances stability during operation
Larger bucket capacity for increased material handling efficiency
Enhanced operator comfort features
Bobcat L65 Cons:
Larger size may limit access in extremely narrow spaces
Higher operating weight may impact transportability
Potentially higher cost due to additional features
Increased fuel consumption
Bobcat vs. CAT 903:
The CAT 903 offers a compact design and lower operating weight, making it suitable for users prioritizing maneuverability and efficiency in confined spaces. However, it falls short in engine horsepower and bucket capacity. The Bobcat L65 stands out with its higher engine horsepower, greater operating weight, and larger bucket capacity, making it a better option for projects requiring enhanced performance and material handling capabilities.