CAT 320 vs Bobcat E60 Excavators
Compare the CAT 320 and Bobcat E60 excavators to determine which model offers superior performance, features, and value. This side-by-side comparison highlights engine power, operating weight, and dig depth to help you choose the best excavator for your property or construction projects.
The CAT 320 is a medium excavator powered by a 162-hp diesel engine. It offers an operating weight of 49,600 lbs and a maximum dig depth of 22 feet. The machine features a compact radius design, allowing it to work efficiently in confined spaces.
The Bobcat E60 is a compact excavator equipped with a 55-hp diesel engine. It has an operating weight of 12,315 lbs and a maximum dig depth of 13.1 feet. The E60’s design enables it to operate effectively in tight areas while providing enhanced stability.
CAT 320 Pros:
Higher engine horsepower (162 hp) for improved performance
Greater operating weight enhances stability during operation
Deeper digging depth of 22 feet
Compact radius design for efficient operation in confined spaces
CAT 320 Cons:
Heavier weight may impact transportability
Larger size may limit access in extremely narrow spaces
Potentially higher cost due to additional features
May require more fuel consumption
Bobcat E60 Pros:
Lighter weight for easier transport
Narrower width for superior accessibility
Optional advanced comfort features
Standard auxiliary hydraulics for attachments
Bobcat E60 Cons:
Lower engine horsepower compared to CAT 320
Lesser digging depth compared to CAT 320
Lower operating weight may affect stability
Smaller fuel tank may require frequent refueling
Bobcat vs. CAT 320:
The CAT 320 offers higher horsepower, greater operating weight, and deeper digging capabilities, making it suitable for users prioritizing power and performance. However, it may be less maneuverable in tight spaces and more challenging to transport. The Bobcat E60 stands out with its lighter weight, narrower width, and optional comfort features, making it a better option for projects requiring enhanced accessibility and operator convenience.